This post is part of a series, click back to the home page to review any part of it you may have missed. Last time I talked about two (of six) criteria that were used, though likely not consciously, by the early church to determine which books, letters, and other writings would be considered part…
Month: May 2012
Where did our Bible come from? Part 9: The first two Criteria for Canonicity
This post is part of a series. To catch up you clan click to read parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 As I’ve already mentioned, following the Diatesseron (which wasn’t itself really a controversy), there no real major controversies surrounding the acceptance what we now take to be the bible. While…
Where did our Bible come from? Part 8: The Diatessaron
Ok, I’ve been bad, really bad, about keeping up with blog posting. That’s not to say I haven’t been busy. Unfortunately, I’ve been busy writing the sort of stuff that probably wouldn’t work to well in a blog post (I doubt anyone (or more than a handful of people) wants to read a 25,000 word…
Soul Fusion May Article
Sorry for the interruption, I hope to get back to my series on where the bible came from on Friday. In the meantime, please feel free to read this article by me from this month’s Soul Fusion magazine on the Trayvon Martin Case (getting controversial over in here): As a general rule, I try to…
